Judge Rejects San Diego Challenge To Medical Pot Law

Linda's picture

Judge Rejects San Diego Challenge To Medical Pot Law
ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/10337614/detail.html

SAN DIEGO -- A state judge on Thursday rejected San Diego County's challenge of California's decade-old law permitting marijuana use for medical purposes.

The ruling by Superior Court Judge William R. Nevitt, Jr., was tentative. The county's lawyers will have a chance to convince the judge to change his decision during oral arguments scheduled later Thursday.

San Diego County sued the state of California and its health services director in February, saying a federal ban on marijuana use trumps state laws that permit usage of the drug with a physician's approval.

Two other California counties, San Bernardino and Merced, joined San Diego as plaintiffs. All three counties have refused to comply with a state requirement that counties issue identification cards for medical marijuana users and maintain a registry of people who apply for the cards.

In his ruling, Nevitt agreed with attorneys for the state, who argued that California is entitled to pass its own drug laws and legislate programs that allow marijuana use for medical purposes.

Five California patients and caregivers, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans for Safe Access and other advocacy groups, joined the case on the side of the state. A sixth patient, Pamela Sakuda, who suffered from rectal cancer, died last Friday, said William Dolphin, a spokesman for ASA.

Supporters of the law expressed relief.
"They tried to make California's medical marijuana law null and void, and they lost," said Anjuli Verma, director of advocacy for the ACLU's Drug Law Reform Project.

San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn said he welcomed the clarity of the judge's ruling.
"All we wanted was guidance from the court telling us where we're at so we don't break any rules and lose any funding," Horn said.
He said the county had not considered whether to appeal if the judge affirms his tentative ruling.

California's law allows people suffering AIDS, cancer, anorexia, chronic pain, arthritis and migraine and "any other illness for which marijuana provides relief" to grow or possess small amounts of marijuana with a doctor's recommendation.

Since California voters passed the law 55 percent approval in 1996, 10 other states have adopted measures protecting qualified patients from prosecution. They are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

Last week, voters in South Dakota rejected a ballot measure to permit marijuana use for medical purposes.
In 2003, the California Legislature amended the 1996 bill to direct county health departments to issue ID cards to medical marijuana users.

Counties, which did not receive money to fulfill the requirement, have been slow to issue ID cards, but San Diego was the first to refuse on legal grounds.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Linda's picture

Patients Win First Round In Fight to Protect MMJ Laws

Patients Win First Round In Fight to Protect Medical Marijuana Laws

Medical marijuana patients around the country scored a major win today, as a California Superior Court judge issued a preliminary ruling that state medical marijuana laws can co-exist with the federal law that prohibits all use.

Following oral arguments by the ACLU, ASA and DPA, as well as the California Attorney General’s office, a San Diego Superior Court judge appeared poised to reject the contention of three California counties – San Diego, San Bernardino and Merced – that the state’s medical marijuana laws are invalid because of a conflict with federal law.

After the judge’s tentative ruling, San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn indicated the counties’ willingness to abide by state law, telling the Associated Press, “All we wanted was guidance from the court telling us where we're at so we don't break any rules and lose any funding."

ASA helped represent Wendy Christakes, Pamela Sakuda, William Britt and Yvonne Westbrook, all Californians who use physician-recommended marijuana to treat medical conditions and their side-effects, including chronic pain and sciatica, multiple sclerosis, rectal cancer, epilepsy and post-polio syndrome. The groups also represent Sakuda’s spouse and caregiver, Norbert Litzinger, as well as Dr. Stephen O’Brien, a physician who specializes in HIV/AIDS treatment in Oakland, California, and believes that many of his seriously ill patients benefit from the medical use of marijuana. Pam Passed away last Friday, and will be missed by all.

While the decision forthcoming is expected to be contested in a higher court, this is a great milestone in medical marijuana history. Cities and counties around the state have used this lawsuit as an excuse to put off the implementation of the voter's will, and some have legitimately waited for guidance from the court. Whatever the case, the next step in the San Diego Campaign for Safe Access will be to mount pressure on the Board of Supervisors to abide by the "guidance of the court."

The court’s tentative ruling, issued earlier today by Judge William R. Nevitt, and which will likely be finalized in the near future, is available at: http://www.sandiego.courts.ca.gov/portal/online/scsdrulings.html. The case is GIC 860665.

The most recent legal filing by the ASA, the ACLU, and DPA is online at: http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?list=type&type=104

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.